Board Thread:The Last Sovereign Discussion/@comment-27713488-20180615004848/@comment-2600:8802:5600:2D00:D507:4B6E:ED72:43DB-20180704181617

So, has anyone else speculated that Ginasta straight up kills the Fucklord? It's set up as at least a possibilty because she is going to confront him in front of Simon's group, and I think it would be interesting for a few reasons.

- Ginasta, after her bombastic appearance, has dwindled in relevancy as an antagonist by both losing to Simon's group and failing to overcome the Incubus Emperor. If she does kill the Fucklord, that would put her back on track for being a good-intentioned antagonist for the story. - I think Simon's group going to war with Erosia and defeating the Fucklord threatens to be too similar to the Third Arclent War, at least from a stoytelling/gameplay standpoint. And now we've already played through a conflict with the Fucklord, so I think something drastically different would be interesting. - Ginasta's refusal to usurp power along with the lack of a heiracrhy in Erosia (beyond the Fucklord) would leave a giant power vaccuum in a country already on the edge. We could see war/conflict as several entities arise in an attempt to seize power in the newly free and vulnerable nation. - Obviously there is a certain katharsis to seeing the Fucklord crushed unambigiously by a woman that would not ring quite the same if he is defeated by Simon's group.

Thoughts?