Talk:Investments/@comment-31047653-20170911113536/@comment-25941257-20170911225245

GafferGamG, your proposal generates huge tables, specially now that we have different yields for the same round.

I insist that RPs=/=Hidden stat boosts. I particularly don't like how is implemented in the Discretionary funding (and the table has a horizontal slider), but it was designed that way and it works reasonably well for me as an user. I don't think that is broken enough to change it, but it's not how I would have designed it.

The idea of rounds vs locations is solid IMHO, and it should be pretty easy to implement, I think. You have convinced me on this point.

The table Other uses for ProN is meant to be for the non-investment cases. It's useful to inform the reader that he can't expect any ProN return, if he decides to spend his money on them.

Casiope, I fail to understand how you're going to improve the readability issues, by splitting the page. Keeping the consistency in two pages is harder than in one and the number of tables is the same. At most, I would see the utility on segregating investments not longer active in chapter 3 (but I'm against it). Also, there is no obligation to split the page, as it can be as longer as needed.

Regarding the investments available at different point no system is perfect. No matter what we do, there are going to be inconsistencies, because for some reason SL has designed her game with the wiki in mind. Unforgivable, I know ;-).