Talk:Ardford summit/@comment-31763506-20181012122037/@comment-27713488-20181013014955

I'm not missing the main point, I just don't think it's sufficiently well-supported to say that there's no reason to preserve a small note that everything about the investment besides the price might not be smiles and roses.

I am sure the word "consequences" was in the original. It wasn't just in a switch name, but also a note-to-self.