Talk:Investments/@comment-44960327-20200411201333/@comment-44960327-20200412200746

@Fluid-decanter, okay I will wait a few days at least and await for further comments in favour or against.

I meant "reducing width" in the sense that things like the cell with "Gasm Falls (Elleani's Cave) Givini Tunnels" currently takes 6 lines to write, because there are 6 columns to fit in that table. If there were fewer columns (less width), we could also reduce the height needed, make it all look a bit more tidy.​​​​​ ​​​​​But okay that's the least important change. I still think there's not much point in putting relationship points in a different column than the other benefits...

I have to say I don't see anything helpful with the profitable/non-profitable distinction -- it also gives the wrong impression that the latter investments are *bad* investments, while it prevents us from putting some investments logically before others (e.g. Lustlord Statues before Lustlord temples). And despite called a 'profitable' investments, one shouldn't choose to fund the Succubus Band Tour for its ProN returns, those are miniscule...​​​​​

Lastly, grouping by order of availability seems better for helping a player see the options currently available to them, as the chapter proceeds...