Board Thread:The Last Sovereign Discussion/@comment-39332473-20190808194309/@comment-31763506-20200316172657

There's a problem with both of those theories.

First is that Xestris is subordinate to the Anak, and the leading theory is that he's "that monster who has Zelica", who Ivala and Mithyn discuss at length as though he is a separate entity from Ivala's captors. Second is that Ivala then refers to her captors... plural, implying there's more than one of them, so the her with the big eye may not be the most important or even one of them.

Of course, Ivala then refers to her captor... singular, when speaking to Tanurak. I'm fairly sure the discrepancy has been pointed out to SierraLee and left uncorrected though.