Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27104094-20160205131602/@comment-27713488-20160207023102

Lostone2 wrote: I feel that there is some subjectivity on this issue: we first have to reach an agreement about what constitutes useful details and what not. For instance: the second note on Janine's page. It' useful to know that so far Janine is not a real harem member? Or it's irrelevant because any player obligatory will know it in due time? It's useful to know, but I do think that it may be OK to make an exception here, and footnote information that is almost certain to be changed in the future. It makes it easier for future editors, to simply delete those notes when they are no longer true.