Thread:Fluid-decanter/@comment-27460754-20160401222501/@comment-27713488-20160402003006

Argenten wrote: you already apologized previous and still went with the greatly erroneous 'hate on" comment, which is ironic since you tried to come down on me hard for my first impression of Vhala being a sociopath, which you said bothered you because it was a harshly general statement. Not sure what to say to this, other than sometimes people mess up twice in similar fashion. I hope you can at least recognize that one poorly chosen word is both marked improvement and much more likely to be a slip-up.

So no, I do not accept your apology because I do not believe you mean it and I do not feel you can accept a person having a differing opinion than yours. Well, I'm sorry to hear that. I've no power to convince you of anything you don't want to believe, least of all my sincerity or goodwill. But as far as I am concerned, this bridge need not be burned; if you choose to recognize the apology in the future it remains open to you.

I did not say anything harsh about Vhala when I gave my latest thoughts, I considered disagreeing, here, but there really is little point to that - it's ultimately irrelevant to whether or not we can be civil about it, which is far more important since we are both real people.

We already made an agreement to disagree, that you broke, Er. Can you show me where I agreed to this? This level of anger and ultimatums would make much more sense to me if I had agreed to something like that.

I would rather stop it here than let it get worse. Regardless of our issues, I do not want to drag the topic and coversatin down as Lostone2 has requested ...if you deem it necessary. It would look silly for only one side of a debate to engage, anyway.