Board Thread:The Last Sovereign Discussion/@comment-27713488-20181103233945/@comment-82.234.101.145-20190803012034

NoelMittUns wrote: Wendis' reaction is what makes the +10 cohesion justifiable. If she gained cohesion while enjoying the torture that would have been fucked up, and too dissonant with the rest of the game.

I don't want to derail the thread, but choosing what is more important between Wendis' sanity and not torturing the Fucklord would be considered ethics under most definitions. Even if it's opinions, it's opinions about ethics. Oh I agree ! I'm just adding my two cents on the subject. I'll add another for the road. Estaven is so far into the evil side that he's not even in the evil anymore, not torturing him or at the minimum, not making him regret would have been a diservice especially since he got what he wanted and died like he wanted, it's still bad, but you know ? I believe it was more a question of what was more important between Wendis or Morality.

... I'm not the most clear of people in insight.

I've been replaying the war, and looking at it, it's pretty clear that Wendis really wanted a piece of Estaven.