Board Thread:The Last Sovereign Discussion/@comment-27713488-20180114010136/@comment-27713488-20180227100634

I think the most interesting part of your theory is the idea of races influencing the nature of their racial goddess. One question is the extent to which the Goddess of Magic is capable of redefining her role to escape that influence, if she was/is a racial goddess. Another less happy question is the extent to which Sarai, Altina, Bertricia, and other non-human Ivalans are deluded about being cared for by Ivala.

Some concerns:
 * It doesn't invalidate any of your points, but the dialogue doesn't specifically identify Zelica as the older sister of Mithyn and the Blond Divinity. It could be the Mother, who also speaks of having sisters. Or someone else, like maybe a Tertia who's merely become terminally apathetic like Alonon rather than dead.
 * Ginasta claims she knows a place where shards can be destroyed. Simon's counterargument is that "most new Incubus Kings seem to find their shards, not receive them from killing another." He also asks if the number of shards dwindles over history, which is what Ginasta has no proof of.
 * "Incophate" - I think you mean "Inchoate", which is just a word meaning formless or undeveloped, used in some enemies' designations. You'll recall that the Tower where they entered was formless until they worked to give it definition around them. "Incophate" is not a word that appears anywhere in dialogue, and most of the theory you've built around "Incophates" probably describes demons if anything.
 * In the chapter 3-4 interlude, Sabitha is pretty strongly implied to be a powerful demon, and the "down" part of the Tower is implied to be the demon realm arcane mages sometimes draw power from. I suppose there's technically room for interpretation on this point.