Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-27104094-20171125215702/@comment-44960327-20200413030452

Hello, I just recently noticed this thread.

I've already added a comment under the Investments page, asking for comments/objections on a proposed reorganization of "Round 5". One of the things i suggest is a detail I don't much mind if you reject (e.g. my suggested merging some columns, to gain some space), but a couple others I feel might be useful:

- Doing away with the separation between "profitable" and "non-profitable" investments... It's not a really meaningful distinction (some of the 'profitable' investments have so low returns-of-investment that you wouldn't ever want them just for the ProN they they fetch back, you'd want them for their other advantages, same as the 'non-profitable' ones)

- Dividing the "Round 5" investments, by order of availability, rather than than by location. Such a separation would allow us to show first all the investments that might have already been funded by players (either via discretionary income or otherwise), then the new available investments in the 1st open world segment, then the investments that become available gradually -- after the return from the Tower, during the Ardan Succession Crisis, after the Gawnfall Council, during the Erosian War, when Thernour opens up, and so forth...

Such a division I feel might be more helpful to players who want to figure out what new things they can invest in each given time... It being a chronological division might allow easier linking from e.g. the Walkthrough as well to specific sections, if such a need is felt reasonable. AND since the concept of "Rounds" is already chronological, further subdivisions within Round 5 also being chronological rather than geographical seems more elegant as well.