Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-31763506-20180626010448/@comment-25941257-20180626223827

Okra-caprese wrote: Oh, my days.

That's intensely comprehensive and obsoletes the sketchy pre-prototype I had done. I notice you had a hand in amending its English? commendable, and a huge thanks to you and Fulminto for it. Yeah, that seems like a better basis for a walkthrough, and format and textual balance can be left to whosoever chooses to work on it.

Are we not linking this gem on the main wikia page? It's e x c e l l e n t.

Also, regarding the main walkthrough segment for his path--huh, I had no idea. I'd more or less forsaken the main walkthrough because it is, as has been said, an inconsistent and fragmented mess, but looking at the Simon's Route framework it is indeed elegant. Optional depth-of-direction in the spoilers isa real good touch.

Added to the Main page of the Wiki (I suspect that most of usual visitors don't stop at the main page, but I forgot to add the link back then, sorry Fulminato).

When one has such a negative OPINION, I think that is common sense and good manners to have the decency to state that it's, in fact, a opinion and not an irrefutable fact. As one of the people that have contributed to the page, I'm asking for constructive criticism or, at least, a little respect. I don't really think that it's too much to ask, really.